<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LNCC &#187; Campaign for Freedom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lncc.org/category/campaign-for-freedom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lncc.org</link>
	<description>Libertarian National Campaign Committee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>LNCC Supports Ed Coleman for Indy City Council</title>
		<link>http://www.lncc.org/lncc-supports-ed-coleman-for-indy-city-council/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lncc.org/lncc-supports-ed-coleman-for-indy-city-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 05:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alicia]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About the Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.45.125.72/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LNCC recently tag-teamed with our sister-committee, the Libertarian National Committee, to donate $55,000 to the re-election campaign of Indianapolis City-County Councilor Ed Coleman. Mr. Coleman is currently considered to be the highest-ranking public office-holder in the Libertarian Party. He was elected in 2007 as a Republican to an at-large seat on the council and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-513" title="Ed Coleman" src="http://96.45.125.72/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Ed-Coleman-100x150.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="150" />The LNCC recently tag-teamed with our sister-committee, the Libertarian National Committee, to donate $55,000 to the re-election campaign of <a href="http://http//www.imwithed.com" target="_blank">Indianapolis City-County Councilor Ed Coleman</a>.</p>
<p>Mr. Coleman is currently considered to be the highest-ranking public office-holder in the Libertarian Party. He was elected in 2007 as a Republican to an at-large seat on the council and switched to the Libertarian Party after being mistreated by the Republican Party for standing on libertarian principles. Mr. Coleman is now in a two-way partisan race for a District 24 seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lncc.org/lncc-supports-ed-coleman-for-indy-city-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain Tires of the Nanny State</title>
		<link>http://www.lncc.org/britain-tires-of-the-nanny-state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lncc.org/britain-tires-of-the-nanny-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.45.125.72/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often point to the United Kingdom as an example of state control with no concern for individual freedom, but our neighbors across the Atlantic are beginning to tire of the nanny state, which is now flourishing here in America. &#8220;The state now performs so many tasks for us that it will be difficult to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often point to the United Kingdom as an example of state control with no concern for individual freedom, but our neighbors across the Atlantic are beginning to tire of the nanny state, which is now flourishing here in America.</p>
<p>&#8220;The state now performs so many tasks for us that it will be difficult to cope without it,&#8221; London&#8217;s Daily Telegraph reports.</p>
<p>&#8220;Before the First World War, as A J P Taylor observed, &#8216;a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the State, beyond the post office and the policeman.&#8217;  Now it intrudes into every aspect of our lives, often with benign intent but not always to our benefit.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Telegraph goes on to provide examples of creeping government intrusion into private lives and choices, even though the Internet and social networks have given rise to greater freedom of thought and less tolerance for poor service.</p>
<p>&#8220;The time has come for it to stop trying to run our lives from the cradle to the grave. The trouble is that we may have turned into a country that feels more comfortable being looked after than looking after itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you think creeping state power into the most mundane details of your life is solely a European phenomenon, take a look at what happened in Minnesota after the governor&#8217;s failure to pass a budget led to a government shutdown.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bars and restaurants with no booze; stores with no cigarettes: that&#8217;s the picture coming into focus in Minnesota, as the effects of the state&#8217;s government shutdown ripple through society. The reasons range from expired liquor permits (which can&#8217;t be renewed) to a lack of cigarette tax stamps (which can&#8217;t be purchased),&#8221; National Public Radio reports. &#8220;With the sale of alcohol and tobacco closely regulated and taxed, stores are quickly running through their supplies, and they&#8217;re asking for special dispensations that would help them serve their customers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even beer already on the shelves must be pulled because of government intrusion.  &#8220;MillerCoors LLC must pull 39 brands of beer from Minnesota bars, restaurants and stores because it failed to renew brand-label registrations before the state government shut down July 1,&#8221; Bloomberg reports.</p>
<p>&#8220;The registration, which must be renewed every three years with a $30 fee per brand, is required for the manufacturing, distribution or sale of alcohol, said Doug Neville, a spokesman for the Minnesota Public Safety Department.  The state has contacted the company seeking a plan for how it will remove the beer from the state and wants that to happen &#8216;within days,&#8217; Neville said in a telephone interview from St. Paul.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t buy beer or cigarettes in Minnesota unless the government has cash?  The Telegraph is right.  The time has come for it to stop trying to run our lives from the cradle to the grave.</p>
<p>As Minnesota&#8217;s state failure shows, Republicans and Democrats can&#8217;t get it done.  It&#8217;s time to vote Libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lncc.org/britain-tires-of-the-nanny-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Athens &#8211; Then London</title>
		<link>http://www.lncc.org/first-athens-then-london/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lncc.org/first-athens-then-london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities going broke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian National Campaign Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rising tax bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save your city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support Libertarians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.45.125.72/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now some American cities are seeing raucous protests by government dependents angry and increasingly violent over the fact free-spending politicians have run out of other people&#8217;s money. And your community may be next. There&#8217;s only way to stop the explosion of government spending, and the destructive rampages that follow when governments spend themselves into bankruptcy&#8230; [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now some American cities are seeing raucous protests by government dependents angry and increasingly violent over the fact free-spending politicians have run out of other people&#8217;s money.</p>
<p>And your community may be next.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s only way to stop the explosion of government spending, and the destructive rampages that follow when governments spend themselves into bankruptcy&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;we must begin electing more Libertarians.</p>
<p>No community is immune from the threat posed by big spending.</p>
<p>By many measures, Loudoun County, Virginia is the wealthiest community in the United States. Located outside suburban Washington, D.C., Loudoun is home to ambassadors, senior government officials, millionaire CEOs, wine vintners and equestrian enthusiasts.</p>
<p>But even this millionaire’s playground is going bankrupt.  Despite years of steadily rising tax bills, Loudoun politicians can’t keep up with their own appetite for spending.</p>
<p>The wealthiest county in the United State faces a $192 million dollar government budget deficit.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s fueled by a government employee retirement system, which gives even part-time political appointees a full, plush retirement package with no contribution from the employee.</p>
<p>Despite facing fiscal destruction and the loss of its high bond rating over its out-of-control spending, the Board narrowly voted to continue its pig-out spending.</p>
<p>And Loudoun is only one example of thousands of city councils, county commissions and state legislatures that, even facing default, narrowly vote to continue spending their citizens into oblivion.</p>
<p>Just imagine what one Libertarian on one of those bodies would do to tilt the balance and save citizens from bankruptcy.</p>
<p><strong><em>That&#8217;s why we created the Libertarian National Campaign Committee.</em></strong></p>
<p>If simply being right was all you needed to win an election, Libertarians would have won long ago.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>You must know how to communicate effectively, target the right voters, raise money and get out the vote.</p>
<p>Your support of the Libertarian National Campaign Committee gives our Libertarian candidates the training, information, technology and support they need to win.</p>
<p>Thank you for supporting the Libertarian National Campaign Committee.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen the terrible price of Big Government in cities like London and Athens.</p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re beginning to see it here in the United States.</p>
<p>Just one Libertarian elected to the city council or county commission is all it would take to turn off the spending spigot in many of our communities.</p>
<p>With your help, we can begin to take back our country and bring fiscal sanity back to our communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lncc.org/first-athens-then-london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More polls show voters want libertarian solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.lncc.org/more-polls-show-voters-want-libertarian-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lncc.org/more-polls-show-voters-want-libertarian-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no deficit spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remove troops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.45.125.72/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is, will Libertarians give LP candidates the support they need to reach out to these voters? &#8220;45 percent of likely U.S. voters say the gap between Americans ‘who want to govern themselves&#8217; and ‘politicians who want to rule over them&#8217; is as great now as it was during the American Revolution&#8221; &#8220;65 percent [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, will Libertarians give LP candidates the support they need to reach out to these voters?</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;45 percent of likely U.S. voters say the gap between Americans ‘who want to govern themselves&#8217; and ‘politicians who want to rule over them&#8217; is as great now as it was during the American Revolution&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;65 percent of Republicans and 47 percent of unaffiliated voters agree&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;84 percent of tea party members also agree&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;40 percent overall disagree&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;56 percent of Democrats disagree with the idea of a gap between citizens and politicians&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>[Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted June 9, reported by The Washington Times' Jennifer Harper.]</em></p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;49 percent of likely voters say the U.S. should remove troops from Western Europe and ‘let Europeans defend themselves.&#8217;&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>[Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted June 12 &amp; 13, reported by The Washington Times' Jennifer Harper]</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;63 percent sat failure to significantly cut spending is more dangerous than a default; 28 percent disagree.&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;56 percent see more short-term economic danger in failing to ‘significantly&#8217; cut federal spending than a government default.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>[Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted June 16, reported by The Washington Times' Jennifer Harper]</em></p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t these voters come home to the Libertarian Party?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what the LNCC is for.  The LNCC is the only organization completely dedicated to giving Libertarian candidates the training, technology, support and materials they need to reach out to voters and build a winning Election Day coalition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lncc.org/more-polls-show-voters-want-libertarian-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: We control your breakfast</title>
		<link>http://www.lncc.org/obama-we-control-your-breakfast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lncc.org/obama-we-control-your-breakfast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign for Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homepage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childhood obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greater personal freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no government intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating the food industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smaller government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Department of Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.45.125.72/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just hours after announcing new government-mandated warning labels on cigarettes, White House officials hinted the federal government will next target breakfast cereals for government control. &#8220;Sebelius did leave open the door to the possibility, perhaps sometime in the future, of some government involvement with the food industry in determining what healthy eating is,&#8221; Human Events&#8217; [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just hours after announcing new government-mandated warning labels on cigarettes, White House officials hinted the federal government will next target breakfast cereals for government control.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sebelius did leave open the door to the possibility, perhaps sometime in the future, of some government involvement with the food industry in determining what healthy eating is,&#8221; Human Events&#8217; John Gizzi reports.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think this [sic] is some space,&#8221; the HHS secretary said, &#8220;that is going to continue to have a robust conversation, because, again, it has a lot to do with underlying health costs and overall health of our nation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Under the Obama proposal, food companies would either &#8220;voluntarily agree&#8221; to remove sugar, sodium and fats from your food, or federal regulators wouldoutlaw their advertising, the Federal Trade Commission, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture propose.</p>
<p>&#8220;The most disturbing aspect of this interagency working group is, after it imposes multibillions of dollars in restrictions on the food industry, there is no evidence of any impact on the scourge of childhood obesity,&#8221; said Dan Jaffe, executive vice president of the Association of National Advertisers, according to Human Events.</p>
<p>Control what you eat from Washington, D.C., or criminalize its advertising?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it time we elected Libertarians?</p>
<p><em>Source: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=44343_" target="_blank">HumanEvents</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lncc.org/obama-we-control-your-breakfast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
